The Negative Side of Too Much Power

In a recent New York Times editorial “The Rich Are More Oblivious than You and Me,” Richard Conniff examines how the rich and famous lose touch with the world and questions if this loss is due to their powerful position in a (social or money) network. He cites a study led by Stanford Professor Dacher Keltner that examines if group leaders tend to over compensate themselves for their performance. In the study, groups of three were assigned a survey to complete while one person was chosen to be the manager of the group.

At the end of the study, five cookies were left on the table and more often than not, the leader grabbed the last cookie. The leader was also “more likely to eat it with his mouth open, spew crumbs on partners and get cookie detritus on his face and on the table,” as Conniff writes. The results of the study suggest that “getting power causes people to focus so keenly on the potential rewards, like money, sex, public acclaim or an extra chocolate-chip cookie… they become oblivious to the people around them.”

While in class we talked about many of the upsides of being in a powerful position in a social network, we did not talk about downsides. Perhaps being “above” everyone else in the network or realizing ones own power makes the most powerful abuse their power. It is interesting that social status could increase personal, and somewhat intangible, negative traits.

Links:

“The Rich Are More Oblivious than You and Me” by Richard Conniff

http://www.nytimes.com/2007/04/04/opinion/04conniff.html?

_r=1&adxnnl=1&oref=slogin&adxnnlx=1175815554-

IuPVpuN3GpR8EAALzCnRmQ

Dacher Keltner Ph.D., Stanford University Professor

http://psychology.berkeley.edu/faculty/profiles/dkeltner.html

Posted in Topics: Education

Responses are currently closed, but you can trackback from your own site.

One response to “The Negative Side of Too Much Power”

  1. stylizedfact Says:

    In another form, this observation/hypothesis is generating a lot of debate.

    Another argument has it that people aspire to be ultra-rich so that they can gain trust through philanthropy:

    Barclay, P. (2004). Trustworthiness and competitive altruism can also solve the “tragedy of the commons”. Evolution and Human Behavior, 25(4), 209-220.

    Overconfidence tends to be observed in corporate senior managements, but people in general tend to be overconfident.



* You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed.